|
|
Saturday, January 18th, 2003
| |
8:34 pm
|
Scientists puzzle over the mystery of the Solomon stone found in Israel. As the London Times puts it: it "is either a state-of-the-art hoax or an ancient Hebrew inscription - more than 2,000 years old - confirming the Biblical account of Solomon's temple." Many people would dearly want this to be true. So in such cases the burden of evidence should be set even higher, to counter the wish-fulfillment impulse.

The military has a problem: not enough bugle players to play taps at all the military funerals. Therefore, they came up with the solution of bugles implanted with electronic chips that contain a recording of taps. No skill is required to play them, beyond being able to flip a switch. Now a group is protesting the use of the fake bugles, and is calling on bugle players throughout the nation to assist at military funerals: www.buglesacrossamerica.org
|
|
(13 comments | comment on this)
|
| Wednesday, January 8th, 2003
| |
12:50 pm - Back Again
|
One of my New Year's resolutions was to be more diligent about posting to my weblog. Oops, I broke that one almost immediately.
The truth is, for the past month I've been getting sucked back into the gravity well of my dissertation. Mastering the obscurities of Jurgen Habermas leaves scarce time for frivolities such as staying on top of the world of hoaxing.
Well, the controversy surrounding Clonaid's claims that they've created a clone was the big thing in the world of hoaxes. I got quoted in this Washington Post article about the situation.
Plus, there was this story about the FBI getting fooled into thinking that 5 terrorists were on the loose around New Year's Eve.
Then yesterday there was this story about radio pranksters calling up Hugo Chavez in Venezuela and tricking him into believing that he was talking to Fidel Castro.
|
|
(1 comment | comment on this)
|
| Sunday, November 17th, 2002
| |
9:53 pm
|
|
| |
9:53 pm - Signing the back of your credit card
|
I had been led to understand that by either not signing the back of my credit card, or by writing "SEE ID" on the back of it, I was somehow making my credit card safer. The reasoning went like this: if someone stole my credit card they would not know what my signature looked like. In addition, they would be forced to show a valid ID in order to use it.
So I go to the post office to mail some packages, and when it comes time to pay I whip out my credit card and hand it to the postal employee. She takes one look at it and says, "I'm sorry, Sir. But this card is not valid unless you sign the back of it." I smirk and explain that by writing "See ID" on the back of it, I've actually made my card more secure. As I say this I thrust my ID eagerly in her face.
But she's not about to budge. She repeats, "I'm sorry, Sir. But this card is not valid unless you sign the back of it."
I hesitate. I'm thinking to myself, "how stupid can this woman be?" I explain once again why I haven't signed it. Her insistence on needing it to be signed doesn't change. So exasperated, and really not wanting to have to leave with my packages unsent, I say loudly, "Okay, I'll sign the card RIGHT NOW!" And dramatically I sign the card and hand it to her.
She takes it, runs it through the machine. And that's that.
But all the way home in my car I'm fuming about the stupidity of this woman. How could she not understand that my card was more secure by not being signed, I'm thinking. Does the post office insist on making credit card users less secure? And after all, why didn't the words 'SEE ID' count as my signifying mark? How did she know that that wasn't my signature? Don't illiterate people sign with the mark "X"? Would the post office not allow illiterate people to use credit cards?
I'm weaving these elaborate arguments in my mind as I drive, and plotting to return to the post office and have a showdown with her manager. Then as soon as I get home I run to the internet and do a search for "SEE ID" and "credit card".
To my dismay Google directs me right to the Visa and Mastercard websites which inform me that it is indeed not allowed to write "SEE ID" on the back of your card. That you MUST sign the back of it.
So I guess I've been the victim of misinformation. I wonder how many other people are wandering around with "SEE ID" on the back of their cards, arguing with all the poor cashiers who tell them that the cards have to be signed?
|
|
(29 comments | comment on this)
|
| Tuesday, November 5th, 2002
| |
10:39 am - Reverse Sokal Hoax
|
|
The Chronicle of Higher Education has a good piece on the 'Reverse-Sokal Hoax' that's been rocking the world of theoretical physics. Unfortunately, you need to be a subscriber to gain access to the article. But the jist of it is that the Bogdanov brothers did not appear to have intentionally been hoaxing the physics community. Instead, they were honestly trying to get PhDs, but did very sloppy work that should never have been accepted.
|
|
(2 comments | comment on this)
|
| Wednesday, October 30th, 2002
| |
3:04 pm
|
|
| |
11:43 am - Forward this e-mail and get free stuff.... Not
|
The Applebees hoax (which, under different permutations has involved Microsoft, Honda, Nike, etc.) got me thinking. Maybe to publicize my book I should start circulating an email like this:
My name is Alex Boese, author of THE MUSEUM OF HOAXES. In an attempt to get the word out about my book to more people, my publisher, Penguin Putnam, is offering a $50 e-gift certificate redeemable at participating online book stores to anyone who forwards this email to 9 of their friends. Just send this email to them and you will receive an email back with a confirmation number to claim your e-gift certificate.
Sincerely Alex Boese Author of THE MUSEUM OF HOAXES. Visit the Museum at: www.museumofhoaxes.com
Hey guys, DONT DELETE THIS EMAIL It really works, I tried it and got my Gift certificate confirmation number in 3 minutes.
Then again, no. People probably wouldn't recognize that it was a spoof (despite the title of the book), and I'd get slapped with some kind of lawsuit for false advertising (though if they believed it, that would be a sign that they really, really needed to read my book to get clued in about hoaxes). But it just amazes me how persistent the "forward this e-mail and get free stuff" hoax is. Offer people freebies and they'll believe anything.
|
|
(3 comments | comment on this)
|
| |
10:03 am - Applebees e-mail hoax
|
A lot of people have been getting this e-mail in their inboxes:
My name is Bill Palmer, founder of Applebees. In an attempt to get our name out to more people in the rural communities where we are not currently located, we are offering a $50 gift certificate to anyone who forwards this email to 9 of their friends. Just send this email to them and you will receive an email back with a confirmation number to claim your gift certificate.
Sincerely Bill Palmer Founder of Applebees Visit us at: www.applebees.com
Hey guys, DONT DELETE THIS EMAIL It really works, I tried it and got my Gift certificate confirmation number in 3 minutes.
Yes, it's a hoax! As confirmed on Applebees own website. There's no way anyone is going to pay people money just for forwarding an e-mail.
|
|
(comment on this)
|
| Sunday, October 27th, 2002
| |
8:31 pm - More on the Reverse Sokal Hoax
|
Regarding the Reverse Sokal Hoax described below: apparently the two brothers supposedly involved in it have denied that it was a hoax (see their statement pasted below). So the mystery continues.
>TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN > > >It was with the greatest astonishment that we have discovered that 2 >members of the Ecole Polytechnique and 2 members of the University of >Tours were the sources of an incredible rumor meant to validate the idea >that our papers were purposly written in serious journals as a hoax. > >Such an assertion is so outrageous that it discredits its authors. The >published papers are the result of 6 years of intense and original work >induced by our 2 PHD thesis in mathematics (1999, for Grichka) and in >Theoretical Physics for myself (2002). > >We have always done our best to bring the highest quality to our work >and papers. > >Thank you for your kind attention, > > >Igor BOGDANOFF, Grichka BOGDANO
|
|
(1 comment | comment on this)
|
| |
8:27 pm - Reverse Sokal Hoax
|
There is an e-mail going around detailing a so-called 'reverse Sokal hoax.' I'm not sure if the circumstances it describes are real or not. But here's the text of the e-mail verbatim:
>> Sometime ago Alan Sokol et al wrote a completely meaningless article on >> quantum gravity which was accepted by a leading, refereed >> "deconstructionist journal". Physicists laughed because the hoax was at >> the deconstructionists' expense. >> >> But now there is is an inverse Sokol hoax in which, apparently, two >> reporters interviewd a lot of string theorists, wrote meaningless >> but "right sounding" papers and even got a Ph.D. Details below. What >> is >> particularly sad is that a key paper appeared in CQG: >> >> <[ Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<class.>') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.] There is an e-mail going around detailing a so-called 'reverse Sokal hoax.' I'm not sure if the circumstances it describes are real or not. But here's the text of the e-mail verbatim:
>> Sometime ago Alan Sokol et al wrote a completely meaningless article on >> quantum gravity which was accepted by a leading, refereed >> "deconstructionist journal". Physicists laughed because the hoax was at >> the deconstructionists' expense. >> >> But now there is is an inverse Sokol hoax in which, apparently, two >> reporters interviewd a lot of string theorists, wrote meaningless >> but "right sounding" papers and even got a Ph.D. Details below. What >> is >> particularly sad is that a key paper appeared in CQG: >> >> <<Class. Quantum Grav. 18 (7 November 2001) 4341-4372 >> >> Topological field theory of the initial singularity of spacetime* >> >> Grichka Bogdanov and Igor Bogdanov >> Mathematical Physics Laboratory, CNRS UPRES A 5029, Bourgogne >> University, >> France >> >> >> >> The trouble is that the abstract seems indistinguishable from standard >> stringy papers. I understand that the CQG Editorial Board already >> discussed this hoax but found that the paper had been refereed by two >> reputable string theorists. >> >> More details: >> ******************************************************************* >> >From Max Niedemayer to Ted Newman >> >> #1. >> I always thought Sokal's hoax would also work in >> theoretical high energy physics. Now there is experimental >> proof. >> >> Two brothers, Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff, journalists >> and science fiction writers, both in their late 40's, >> decided it is high time to earn a PhD, and that this should >> be just as easy in `stringy' high energy physics as it >> alledgedly is in sociology. >> >> First they interviewed a number of prominent French string >> theorists in order to accquire the lingo, then (apparently >> without help from a trained physicist) spoofed two theses. >> To prepare the ground for their defense they spread rumors >> of them being geniuses and their theses being a milestone >> in theoretical physics. Although the official PhD awarding >> institution is only the (so far not too renowned) Universite de >> Bourgogne the members of the thesis committee certainly make >> up for it: R. Jackiw (MIT), J. Morava (John Hopkins), >> S. Majid (Cambridge), C. Kounnas (ENS), I. Antoniadis (CERN >> and Ecole Polytechnique), and others. For the actual defense >> they rented a hall in the prestigeous Ecole Polytechnique, >> arranged a big dinner with the president, invited the TV, >> ... and passed gloriously. The thesis can be found on the >> offical CNRS server (http://www.ccsd.cnrs.fr/). Already the >> abstract is a delightfully meaningless combination of buzzwords, >> that almost beats Sokal's, but which apparently has been taken >> seriously by the committee! >> >> The bad side of the joke is, that it might hurt theoretical >> physics in general. The CNRS apparently even contemplates to >> split the present theoretical physics division into a pure >> mathematics and an experimental physics branch. Theoretical >> physics, being now more fiction than science, is meant to be >> entertained by professionals in that area. Hopefully the Bogdanoff >> ``singularity invariant'' for the ``topological expansion phase'' >> of the universe will provide a way out ... >> >> I'll keep you informed. Best regards, >> >> -- Max >> >> #2. >> Dear Ted, >> sure you can show the letter to others. Let me stress >> however (and maybe you should too) that this is not first >> hand information. A person who has first hand information >> is J. Magnen, from the Ecole Polytechnique. He works on >> constructive QFT and was not personally involved. >> The issue was apparently discussed in the French National >> Research Council, where Peter Forgacs is a member, and he >> is my source. >> >> A small correction. >> In the last minute it seems the theses were not accepted at >> the Ecole Polytechnique, but only later by the University >> of Bourgogne. The TV was also not permitted to the actual >> defense, but several people here saw reports on the Bogdanoff >> brothers decribing them as outstanding geniuses. >> >> The theses and the committee members can be looked up on the >> web at http://www.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ >> >> All the best, >> >> -- Max >> >> >> ******************************************************************** >> HOAX THESIS: >> Abstract in english: >> >> We propose in this research a new solution regarding the >> existence and the content of the initial spacetime singularity. In the >> context of topological field theory we consider that the initial >> singularity of space-time corresponds to a zero size singular >> gravitational instanton characterized by a Riemannian metric >> configuration (++++) in dimension D = 4. Connected with some unexpected >> topological data corresponding to the zero scale of space-time, the >> initial singularity is thus not considered in terms of divergences of >> physical fields but can be resolved in the frame of topological field >> theory. We get this result from the physical observation that the >> pre-spacetime is in a thermal equilibrium at the Planck scale. >> Therefore >> it should be subject to the KMS condition. We consequently consider >> that >> this KMS state might correspond to a unification between "physical >> state" (Planck scale) and "topological state" (zero scale). Then it is >> suggested that the "zero scale singularity" can be understood in terms >> of topological invariants, in particular the first Donaldson invariant. >> Therefore, we here introduce a new topological index, connected with 0 >> scale, of the form Z = Tr (-1)s, which we call "singularity invariant". >> Interestingly, this invariant corresponds also to the invariant >> topological current yield by the hyperfinite II* von Neumann algebra >> describing the zero scale of space-time. In such a context we >> conjecture >> that the problem of inertial interaction might be explained in terms of >> topological amplitude connected with the singular zero size >> gravitational instanton corresponding to the initial singularity of >> spacetime. >> Keywords : KMS State, topological field theory, singularity invariant, >> initial singularity, zero size instanton PACS : 0420D, 04.65.+e, >> 02.40.Xx, 04.60.-m, 05.45.-a
|
|
(comment on this)
|
| Tuesday, October 8th, 2002
| |
4:27 pm - A plug for my book
|
I recently received the first copies of my book. It looks good. I especially like the cover art, which I can't claim any credit for at all. It should go on sale in bookstores next month, the week of November 11.
While browsing through it I only noticed one typo which the printers made. Unfortunately that typo occurred in my Dad's name. They spelled it 'Klause' instead of 'Klaus.' Sorry, Dad! It wasn't my fault!!

My publisher tells me that the book can be pre-ordered through these online vendors: Amazon, Barnes & Noble, Books-a-Million, Booksense, and Borders (which apparently is teamed with Amazon). But don't forget that you can also inquire about it at your local bookseller.
|
|
(1 comment | comment on this)
|
| |
3:43 pm - Fake Bank Website, NYC Parade, Blue Peter Letter
|
|
| Monday, October 7th, 2002
| |
1:17 pm - Hussein's Doubles, Henry Raddick
|
Last week I decided that I had to get more work done on my dissertation, so I determined to go to the campus library every day and work. I stuffed my laptop in my backpack, put a whole lot of books in there as well, strapped all this to my back, and then made the long walk from the campus parking lot to the library. After doing this for a week, my back was killing me, and I spent the weekend downing tylenol and nursing my muscles back to health. I guess this is what happens as you get older. Ouch.
The NY Times has an interesting piece about Hussein's use of doubles (requires registration). I especially like their quote from Antonio Mendez, former chief of disguise for the CIA: "The truth must have a bodyquard of lies."
While nursing my back, I spent some time reading the Amazon book reviews of Henry Raddick. If you're unfamiliar with this reviewer, you should definitely take the time to acquaint yourself with his work. Rumor has it that Raddick is actually a pseudonym for none other than Prince Charles, a rumor which the Prince vociferously denies. Last year Raddick, or whoever he really is, was involved in a more outright hoax: impersonating Andrew Lloyd Webber on Amazon. Unfortunately, all of Raddick's reviews as Webber have been yanked by Amazon, though the Register has managed to resurrect a few of them.
|
|
(comment on this)
|
| Wednesday, October 2nd, 2002
| |
11:19 am - Blonde Joke, Streisand/Shakespeare
|
|
| Tuesday, October 1st, 2002
| |
3:46 pm - Kevin Mitnick
|
|
| Monday, September 30th, 2002
| |
2:25 pm - Scientific Fraud and Japan's Ceramic Toad
|
Scientific Fraud at Bell Labs. Jan Hendrik Schon, a nanotechnology hotshot, gets caught falsifying data.
From the Financial Times, the search for the celebrated ceramic toad of Japan:
Few stories encapsulate the madness that was Japan's economic bubble as neatly as the tale of the most powerful ceramic toad in stock market history. At one point in the late 1980s, this toad controlled a Dollars 20bn portfolio, having received trading tips via messages from the gods. This amphibian George Soros has since disappeared, and its owner, a former bar hostess-turned-restaurant owner, is in jail. But on the basis that the gods might still be sending it messages, the Financial Times travelled to Osaka, Japan's most entrepreneurial city, to try to track down this slippery metaphor for all that went wrong with Japan. The toad was owned by Nui Onoue, herself an extraordinary product of the 1980s. Having started out as a hostess, she invested funds derived from her relations with a powerful construction magnate in a restaurant in Osaka's entertainment area of Sennichimae. It was on the fourth floor of this restaurant, called Egawa, that the toad held court. Mrs Onoue had developed a reputation around the tables of her restaurant for astute stock market purchases and her customers demanded to know her secret. She led them upstairs and showed them the one metre high ceramic toad. She asked them to lay their hands on its head, chanted some mantras, and dispelled the toad's wisdom in the form of stock market tips. If the toad's influence had ended there it would have been little more than a story of unusual reptilian resource. But as word spread she was visited by senior executives from the Industrial Bank of Japan, Nomura Securities, Yamaichi Securities and others. According to Alex Kerr, an author, by 1991, IBJ had lent her Y240bn and 29 other banks and financial institutions had advanced her more than Y2,800bn. Lines of limousines were parked every night outside her restaurant awaiting the toad's pronouncements. Her portfolio collapsed alongside the Nikkei 225 in 1989 and Mrs Onoue was eventually sentenced to 12 years in jail for using fake certificates of deposit as collateral for loans. The chairman of IBJ, one of Japan's most powerful men, was forced to resign as a result of his trust in Mrs Onoue's web-footed friend. But the whereabouts of the toad remain unknown.
|
|
(1 comment | comment on this)
|
| |
1:44 pm
|
|
| Thursday, September 26th, 2002
| |
12:30 pm - abduction prank and crop circle
|
|
| Monday, September 23rd, 2002
| |
8:25 am - John Myatt, Wesleyan e-mail riot
|
 The forger John Myatt has now become respectable and is showing and selling his art in galleries. The works are still forgeries, but now they're openly acknowledged as such, and they're flying off the shelves.
A glitch in Wesleyan's e-mail system sparked an e-mail riot when students realized that they were all plugged into a network that gave them access to the e-mail of every other student at the colle
|
|
(1 comment | comment on this)
|
| Thursday, September 19th, 2002
| |
3:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|